[lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- From: "Phil Enns" <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:08:32 -0400
Paul Stone wrote:
"I guess we are only allowed to discuss the acceptable ideas?"
MACAMP has not been part of any discussion yet. I would hope that Andreas
would reconsider if MACAMP were to actually contribute to a discussion but
till then I am glad Andreas has stepped in to moderate. There are more
appropriate venues for distributing news clippings.
Sincerely,
Phil Enns
Toronto, ON
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- From: Paul Stone
- [lit-ideas] Re: Philosophy Matters (was Censorship)
- From: wokshevs
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Censorship
- From: Paul Stone
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- [lit-ideas] Re: Censorship
- From: Paul Stone
- [lit-ideas] Re: Philosophy Matters (was Censorship)
- From: wokshevs
- [lit-ideas] Censorship
- From: Paul Stone