Morality may be grounded in rationality, but rationality is subservient to the emotions. Therefore, morality is either grounded in the emotions or it's an academic construct. Maybe that's why humanity talks a good line about morality while their behavior is downright venal. And that's on a good day. On a bad day ...
Suppose you're angry because you believe someone has been lying to you. It turns out that they've been telling the truth. Do you continue to be angry with them? Is this a case of 'rationality' being 'subservient' to the emotions, or vice versa?
Imagine that the War Department mistakenly informs you that your brother has been killed in battle. Do you continue to feel grief, anger, and shock, when you learn that he's safe and sound? Specifically, do you still grieve for him?
You're happy because you've passed the bar exam. Woops, computer error! Still celebrating?
Robert Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html