[LRflex] Re: Water Spots? MORE QUESTIONS
- From: Philippe Amard <phamard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 10:39:39 +0200
I've tried to follow the thread and read the documentation on the sorry
"water spots" episode.
- I come to the conclusion that digital is not the best of the worlds as
i thought it was - with film, you had to wait until you saws your pixes,
but dust was not such a problem, was it?
- I also deduce that bridge with built-in lenses are better protected -
but their uses are still limited to "standard" snaps.
- I now have doubts about the Digital back, which should all the more be
prone to that kind of problem as you must be very very careful when you
adapt the back I guess (never seen one by the way)
- I get to think that nothing's perfect and i should wait a little more
before turning to digital.
What do you think?
Phileica
David Young wrote:
>JR Geoffrion wrote:
>
>
>
>>David,
>>
>>What you have are dust spots. Dust spots will be more visible as you stop
>>down. The Telyt with the 2x is pretty dark which explains why you see the
>>spots more.
>>
>>To see the spots, take a lens stop it down to f22 [at infinity] and shoot a
>>uniform surface (I typically more the camera to make sure the surface is
>>really "smooth"). Spots should be in [relatively] the same position
>>everytime (it's dust -- and most will move around a little).
>>
>>Hope this helps.
>>
>>JR Geoffrion
>>
>>
>>
>That 's far to logical, and reasonable. :-)
>
>
>
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
