[LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- From: "Aram Langhans" <leica_r8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 10:02:54 -0800
Perhaps David shoots most of his photos with the polarizer in the same
orientation, one that has the least effect on the exposure. I would find
that hard to believe, as he is a very diverse photographer, but it is a
(slight) possibility.
I am behind on my reading, and catching up from the least to most recient,
so maybe this has been answered.
Aram
From: S Gardner <scottgee1@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:29:14 -0800 (PST)
Hmmm . . . I find this interesting . . .
I already deleted David's original response or I'd reply to it, but I
recall him saying he has quite happily used a linear polarizer for years
with his 'R' series cameras and may prefer the results to those he gets
with a circular polarizer.
H. Herr suggested David may have used negative film with enough latitude to
compensate exposure errors, but I'm wondering if that's true and if not, a
linear polarizer may indeed 'work'. David, do you shoot 'chromes with your
linear polarizer attached?
Not what I'd expect based upon what I've been told to believe, but I have a
real strong bias for experience over theory.
Back in the days when manual focus was the ONLY option we had, I had and
frequently used one of those delightful oversized Nikon linear polarizers.
Color saturation was splendid, especially with K25.
Just wondering . . . /Scott Gardner
David Young <dnr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
At 1/17/2005, you wrote:
>Hey Guy's,
>
>Here's an even better one.
>
>I once had a Sigma SA-1 camera (Ricoh) which had an LCD in the viewfinder
>and unless you used a circular polarizer, the whole LCD went black!! Talk
>about fun to use!
>
>Art Tafil
I trust it only went black when the polarizer was in certain
orientations... ;-)
----------
David Young, | égalité, liberté,
Victoria, CANADA | fraternité et Beaujolais.
Personal Web-site at:
http://www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr
Leica Reflex Forum web-page:
http://www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! ? Get yours free!
_________________________________________________________________
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee®
Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
- Follow-Ups:
- [LRFlex] Lake Union in the Rain
- From: Aram Langhans
- References:
- [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- From: S Gardner
Other related posts:
- » [LRFlex] Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- » [LRFlex] Polarizer
From: S Gardner <scottgee1@xxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:29:14 -0800 (PST)
Hmmm . . . I find this interesting . . .
I already deleted David's original response or I'd reply to it, but I recall him saying he has quite happily used a linear polarizer for years with his 'R' series cameras and may prefer the results to those he gets with a circular polarizer.
H. Herr suggested David may have used negative film with enough latitude to compensate exposure errors, but I'm wondering if that's true and if not, a linear polarizer may indeed 'work'. David, do you shoot 'chromes with your linear polarizer attached?
Not what I'd expect based upon what I've been told to believe, but I have a real strong bias for experience over theory.
Back in the days when manual focus was the ONLY option we had, I had and frequently used one of those delightful oversized Nikon linear polarizers. Color saturation was splendid, especially with K25.
Just wondering . . . /Scott Gardner
David Young <dnr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: At 1/17/2005, you wrote:
>Hey Guy's, > >Here's an even better one. > >I once had a Sigma SA-1 camera (Ricoh) which had an LCD in the viewfinder >and unless you used a circular polarizer, the whole LCD went black!! Talk >about fun to use! > >Art Tafil
I trust it only went black when the polarizer was in certain orientations... ;-)
----------
David Young, | égalité, liberté, Victoria, CANADA | fraternité et Beaujolais.
Personal Web-site at: http://www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr Leica Reflex Forum web-page: http://www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm Archives are at: www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! ? Get yours free!
- [LRFlex] Lake Union in the Rain
- From: Aram Langhans
- [LRFlex] Re: Polarizer
- From: S Gardner