Hmmm . . . I find this interesting . . . I already deleted David's original response or I'd reply to it, but I recall him saying he has quite happily used a linear polarizer for years with his 'R' series cameras and may prefer the results to those he gets with a circular polarizer. H. Herr suggested David may have used negative film with enough latitude to compensate exposure errors, but I'm wondering if that's true and if not, a linear polarizer may indeed 'work'. David, do you shoot 'chromes with your linear polarizer attached? Not what I'd expect based upon what I've been told to believe, but I have a real strong bias for experience over theory. Back in the days when manual focus was the ONLY option we had, I had and frequently used one of those delightful oversized Nikon linear polarizers. Color saturation was splendid, especially with K25. Just wondering . . . /Scott Gardner David Young <dnr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: At 1/17/2005, you wrote: >Hey Guy's, > >Here's an even better one. > >I once had a Sigma SA-1 camera (Ricoh) which had an LCD in the viewfinder >and unless you used a circular polarizer, the whole LCD went black!! Talk >about fun to use! > >Art Tafil I trust it only went black when the polarizer was in certain orientations... ;-) ---------- David Young, | égalité, liberté, Victoria, CANADA | fraternité et Beaujolais. Personal Web-site at: http://www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr Leica Reflex Forum web-page: http://www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm Archives are at: www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! ? Get yours free!