[iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- From: Jeremy C B Nicoll <Jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: iyonix-support@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 01:03:29 +0100
In article <299bbf4d4e.peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Peter Bell <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In message <4e4daa8653Jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Jeremy C B Nicoll <Jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Some ISPs, not all of them though, copy the info that was in the
> > SMTP envelope to a fake header and include it in the mail.
> > Generally that's an "Envelope-To:" header. But not all ISPs do
> > that.
> This info is, presumably, the same as appears after the 'for' in each
> 'Received:' header.
I'm not sure; if the mail has been forwarded at some point then I think
some of the earlier received headers will show the original intended
recipient then after the rewrite the later intended recipient.
A mail like ones on this list have "Received: ... for" values that (not
surprisingly) describe the list itself in the earlier headers and
individual recipients later (ie in headers nearer the top of the mail)
on.
Also, from a filtering pov, there's the problem that the "for" might
not be on the same line as the recipient address; "received:" headers
get spread across multiple lines.
--
Jeremy C B Nicoll, Edinburgh, Scotland - my opinions are my own.
---
To alter your preferences or leave the group,
visit http://www.freelists.org/list/iyonix-support
Other info via http://www.freelists.org/webpage/iyonix-support
- References:
- [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- From: Chris Evans
- [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- From: Iyonix . 2006
- [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- From: David J. Ruck
- [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- From: Iyonix . 2006
- [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- From: Jeremy C B Nicoll
- [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- From: Peter Bell
Other related posts:
- » [iyonix-support] Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- » [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- From: Chris Evans
- [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- From: Iyonix . 2006
- [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- From: David J. Ruck
- [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- From: Iyonix . 2006
- [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- From: Jeremy C B Nicoll
- [iyonix-support] Re: Spam infiltration
- From: Peter Bell