This is really more appropriate on the Glass Elevator list. There will *NOT* be a preferences server in R5. If you get to do cool, new stuff, so do I. And do does everyone else. And then we don't finish R1 until 2050. I don't like it any more than you do. But I think that it is the wise choice. >>> So you are against the idea of starting by having a R5 equivalent? >> >>No no, don't get me wrong, I just wanted to consider alternatives that >>won't take more time to implement than the original behaviour. > >Personally I believe a Pref_Server of some kind, along with a decent >XML-Format for storing an Applications >settings should not be that hard to implement (although it might underestimate >the XML-Part here). Including one in >the initial release and having the Preference Apps replacements used when >approiate, while staying compatible to >the old way of storing (if possible) should not be huge task. > >>Some kind of "Forward thinking", but perhaps it takes to much time to >>discuss the viable alternatives, so just do it later :-) > >Well, whoever wants to write a simple Pref_Server and define that >Settings-DTD, sure why not. If it is going to be >included in R1 or not, we`ll see. >As I personally like that idea, I propose whoever is interested in actual >doing something, mails me off-list, and we`ll >discuss further proceedings. I just don´t want another "We definetly need this >almost-unrelated-feature fast"- >Thread emerge. > >Tschoe, > > Olli > >-- >No sig left for today > >