"Humdinger" <humdingerb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > BTW, I asked myself the same thing for the image Exif stuff like > aperture, focal length, iso. Do many people need to see this in > Tracker, do they sort a folder after iso settings? Or does this > information only become interesting when actually viewing an image? > Maybe with photos it makes more sense, because of a possible > ThumbnailView in Tracker... I've mostly added the image attributes to be able to query for them rather than to see them in a Tracker column. It's probably not really useful for everyone, so those would be candidates for hidden attributes, too. Bye, Axel.