[gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 09:35:02AM -0500, gogins@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I would call the standard C++ library a new feature - lots of new features
> with lots of, until then, esoteric programming techniques that are now
> widely used for good reason.

Actually the C++ STL was written in the late 70's, was ported to C++ in
1990 and didnt get standarised until 1998 (ISO/IEC 14882).

The the 70's template features were pretty novel, but it didn't get
standardised until it was very well established technology.

Back on topic: I think that standardisation should enable research (often
a standardised, open and versatile platform helps), but not depend on it.
My interest as as much in research as they are development - I'm employed
by a research department.

- Steve

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: