[gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- From: "gogins@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <gogins@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:35:02 -0500
I would call the standard C++ library a new feature - lots of new features
with lots of, until then, esoteric programming techniques that are now
widely used for good reason.
Original Message:
-----------------
From: Steve Harris S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:14:19 +0000
To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 08:06:41 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 08:38:14PM -0500, Michael Gogins wrote:
> > Since C++ continues to be the most widely used language for application
> > programming, most especially in our field of music, it must be a voice
FOR.
>
> It is also one of the more maligned languages from a simplicity and
> cleanliness point of view. :)
And it didn't actually introduce new features at the standardisation level
AFAIK, some of the features in the original macro implementation may have
been new (and it was a real mess), but not by the time it came to
any kind of standardisation.
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- From: Steve Harris
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- From: Steve Harris