[gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- From: "Michael Gogins" <gogins@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 20:38:14 -0500
Since C++ continues to be the most widely used language for application
programming, most especially in our field of music, it must be a voice FOR.
============================================
Michael Gogins
gogins at pipeline period com
Irreducible Productions
CsoundVST, an extended version of Csound for programming music and sound
Available at http://sourceforge.net/projects/csound/
============================================
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Hockin" <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 4:37 PM
Subject: [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 04:29:41PM -0500, gogins@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > The C++ standards committee incorporated into the C++ standard a lot of
> > ideas that most C++ programmers had never seen nor heard of before.
>
> I'm not sure if that is a voice FOR or AGAINST clever new things :)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
> Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
> following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
> words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
> redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
>
> Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
> Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- From: Tim Hockin
- References:
- [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- From: gogins@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- From: Tim Hockin
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- » [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- From: gogins@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- [gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- From: Tim Hockin