[gmpi] Re: ramps vs audio-rate controls
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:09:22 -0800
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 10:36:37AM +0000, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 10:56:09 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > We're supposed to be forward thinking, right?
>
> Hmmm... IMHO stardards should not require research to get them written.
> If you are writign anything into the standard which has need been tried
> and tested in muptiple systems you're asking for truoble.
A *lot* of what we're talking about in GMPI is experimental. If we really
want to take the approach of not experimenting, then we should be keeping
everything very simple and similar to what exists today.
ALL:
Is this what we're supposed to be doing? If we have so little room as to
think up new/better ways of doing things then let's get that on the table.
We can finish the requirements doc this month, if that is true, I think.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
