[gmpi] Re: NAMM working group meeting report
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 20:33:02 +0000
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 09:07:21 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > There was some concern about how to uniquely identify plugins.
> > Possible solutions discussed included GUIDs or some other unique
> > identification method.
>
> This is a simple problem. centrally administered *anything* is a mess, but
> we CAN find a way to do it.
Yes, at te hvery least we can piggyback onto an existing allocation
scheme, eg. DNS, ala Java library naming and URIs.
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- References:
- [gmpi] NAMM working group meeting report
- From: RonKuper
- [gmpi] Re: NAMM working group meeting report
- From: Tim Hockin
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] NAMM working group meeting report
- » [gmpi] Re: NAMM working group meeting report
- » [gmpi] Re: NAMM working group meeting report
- » [gmpi] Re: NAMM working group meeting report
- » [gmpi] Re: NAMM working group meeting report
- » [gmpi] Re: NAMM working group meeting report
- » [gmpi] Re: NAMM working group meeting report
- [gmpi] NAMM working group meeting report
- From: RonKuper
- [gmpi] Re: NAMM working group meeting report
- From: Tim Hockin