[gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 08:30:17 -0800
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:04:40AM -0500, Ron Kuper wrote:
> I prefer 16-bit Unicode. We spent several months last year converting
> SONAR non-English from multibyte character sets to straight 16-bit
> Unicode. I much prefer the Unicode, it makes string length counting etc
> much easier.
I punted to spec on this issue. It seems to be pretty obviously a spec
issue :)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gmpi-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gmpi-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Tim Hockin
> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 8:53 PM
> To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 01:45:57PM +1300, Jeff McClintock wrote:
> > Handling UTF-8 multibyte characters is a big inefficient pain. Some
>
> > characters are 8 bits, some are extended to multiple bytes. Some
> > strings have mixtures of single-byte and multi-byte chracters Any
> kind
> > of string manipulation is complicated by having to scan the string
> from
> > the beginning so as to avoid chopping a multi-byte character in two.
> > Novice programmers ignore the multi-byte characters and treat the
> string
> > as ASCII, leading to internationalization bugs.
> > I believe most programmers will find it easier to deal with
> > fixed-width strings using the ANSI wchar_t datatype.
>
> I'm no localization expert. So I'll defer on arguing this any further.
> I
> don't want to make string handling a pain in the ass, but obviously it
> will be for someone if it is not for someone else :)
>
> Anyone else? Maybe the requirement should be more vague, and punt the
> decision to the spec?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
> Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
> following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your
> own
> words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
> redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
>
> Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
> Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
> Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
> following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
> words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
> redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
>
> Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
> Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
--
Tim Hockin
thockin@xxxxxxxxxx
Soon anyone who's not on the World Wide Web will qualify for a government
subsidy for the home-pageless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- References:
- [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Ron Kuper
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Ron Kuper