[gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: GMPI list <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 12:14:39 +0000
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 11:48:00PM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 11:38:30PM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > Make some time - just 1/2 hour is enough. Read the first 15 sections of
> > the GMPI req's document and offer any feedback. This includes language
> > changes, spelling, grammar, etc. This is it. The draft of the final
> > req's document.
>
> I'll go first:
>
> I think we should strike #13: "best practices and recommendations for
> realtime programming." That's nice, but we're not a writing a textbook.
Agreed.
> I think we should clarify or strike #15: "multi-pass processing". Isn't
> that the plugin's internal problem?
No, it adds the requirement that that plugin can "seek" over the audio
data, ie. not just processes it as a stream.
This is needed for a normalise plugin for e.g. One pass to find the max
amplitude, and one to apply the gain change.
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
