[gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.

On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 11:48:00PM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 11:38:30PM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > Make some time - just 1/2 hour is enough.  Read the first 15 sections of
> > the GMPI req's document and offer any feedback.  This includes language
> > changes, spelling, grammar, etc.  This is it.  The draft of the final
> > req's document.
> 
> I'll go first:
> 
> I think we should strike #13: "best practices and recommendations for
> realtime programming."  That's nice, but we're not a writing a textbook.

Agreed.
 
> I think we should clarify or strike #15:  "multi-pass processing".  Isn't
> that the plugin's internal problem?

No, it adds the requirement that that plugin can "seek" over the audio
data, ie. not just processes it as a stream.

This is needed for a normalise plugin for e.g. One pass to find the max
amplitude, and one to apply the gain change.

- Steve

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: