[gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: "Ron Kuper" <RonKuper@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:04:40 -0500
I prefer 16-bit Unicode. We spent several months last year converting
SONAR non-English from multibyte character sets to straight 16-bit
Unicode. I much prefer the Unicode, it makes string length counting etc
much easier.
-----Original Message-----
From: gmpi-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gmpi-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Tim Hockin
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 8:53 PM
To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 01:45:57PM +1300, Jeff McClintock wrote:
> Handling UTF-8 multibyte characters is a big inefficient pain. Some
> characters are 8 bits, some are extended to multiple bytes. Some
> strings have mixtures of single-byte and multi-byte chracters Any
kind
> of string manipulation is complicated by having to scan the string
from
> the beginning so as to avoid chopping a multi-byte character in two.
> Novice programmers ignore the multi-byte characters and treat the
string
> as ASCII, leading to internationalization bugs.
> I believe most programmers will find it easier to deal with
> fixed-width strings using the ANSI wchar_t datatype.
I'm no localization expert. So I'll defer on arguing this any further.
I
don't want to make string handling a pain in the ass, but obviously it
will be for someone if it is not for someone else :)
Anyone else? Maybe the requirement should be more vague, and punt the
decision to the spec?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your
own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Tim Hockin
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Tim Hockin