[gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:48:39 +0000
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 03:28:43PM +0100, Sébastien Métrot wrote:
> Steve Harris wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 01:45:57 +1300, Jeff McClintock wrote:
> >
> >
> >>HI,
> >>My point is, both Windows and Mac API use 16bit UNICODE. If you pass my
> >>plugin a 8bit string I've got to convert it, I've got to allocate memory
> >>to hold the longer 16bit representation. Then if I need to pass it back
> >>I've got to convert it back to multibyte.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Actually windows uses UTF-16, and I'm pretty sure OSX uses UTF-8 nativly.
> >
> >
> >
> No, Windows uses UCS-2. UTF-16 is a multibyte (variable length)
Not in XP and newer:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/netframework/programming/bcl/faq/systemiofaq.aspx
It used to be UCS-2, but they ran into the normal fixed-width problems.
They seem to be recommending UTF-8 for i/o, and the MS tools generate
UTF-8 files unless told otherwise.
> The problem with Other unicode coding than UTF-8 is that they are not
> ASCII compatible which means that you'll need conversion routines a lot
> if you want to continue using 8 bit APIs (think about the number of
> dependecies one can get in a plugin: libjpeg, freetype2, libpng, zlib,
> libsndfile, etc...). UTF-8 is much more legacy code friendly, even if
> you still have some work to do to adapt your code without making
> mistakes (glyph separation is a good example, as is hyphenation).
>
> I've done quite a lot of Japanese, Chinese, Arab, Hebrew, Korean,
> Russian localization at some point in my career. I personally found that
> UTF-8 often is a good solution for existing code. If you master all the
> build chain then wchar_t (UCS-2 on Mac and Win32, UCS-4 on unices) may
> be a good solution but then you'll need unicode fonts and all that jazz.
I've also done a fair bit of I18N work, and my experinces match yours;
UTF-8 is the least painful option.
The Unices I work with (Solris, Linux) use UTF-8 internally, as do most
databases and XML engines.
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: http://www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Paul Davis
- References:
- [gmpi] GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Jeff McClintock
- [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Jeff McClintock
- [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Steve Harris
- [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Sébastien Métrot
Other related posts:
- » [gmpi] GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- » [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Paul Davis
- [gmpi] GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Jeff McClintock
- [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Jeff McClintock
- [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Steve Harris
- [gmpi] Re: GMPI req's draft 1 for review.
- From: Sébastien Métrot