[geocentrism] Re: disturbing deceit!
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:08:29 -0000
Dear Regner,
I do not follow what you are saying in this paragraph 1? what's the Bible
got to do with the content of my e-mail?
Paragraph 2 is a very convenient sidestep, shoulder shrugging and quite
irrational. We know and you know that there is no scientific discipline that
is able to address this problem. How do you know evolution is a very
successful theory - it's completely shot with problems, the only reason for
sticking with is a philosophical one. If agiogenesis didn't happen then what
was going to evolve?
In saying all this I am seriously in breach of my proposed rule of sticking
to the original point in question which was about the celestial poles.
Please let's not get sidetracked and in respect of your busyness, I'm
retired and therefore have more time to indulge in the extra issues.
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: "Regner Trampedach" <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 10:45 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: disturbing deceit!
SNIP
1
Absolutely besides my point. How would we have been able to do those
things if scientists have no idea what they are doing. The bible doesn't
tell how to build a computer. Do you not believe in a computer because
you wouldn't know how to build one yourself?
SNIP
2
And the highly succesful theory of evolution has never and will never say
anything about how life started. Why is that so hard to understand?!?!?
And it is not the foundation of evolution either.
- Regner
Jack
Other related posts:
