[geocentrism] Re: disturbing deceit!
- From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:36:19 +1100
Quoting Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Dear Regner,
> I do not follow what you are saying in this paragraph 1? what's the Bible
> got to do with the content of my e-mail?
>
From what you write, you seem to consider the Bible an authority on
astronomy, history and evolution. I apologize if I'm off the mark here.
> Paragraph 2 is a very convenient sidestep, shoulder shrugging
>
No.
> and quite
> irrational. We know and you know that there is no scientific discipline that
>
> is able to address this problem. How do you know evolution is a very
> successful theory - it's completely shot with problems, the only reason for
> sticking with is a philosophical one. If agiogenesis didn't happen then what
> was going to evolve?
>
Evolution is not concerned with Genesis - that is handled elsewhere in science.
It's part of the real world - therefore it is amenable to scientific
investigation.
> In saying all this I am seriously in breach of my proposed rule of sticking
> to the original point in question which was about the celestial poles.
> Please let's not get sidetracked and in respect of your busyness, I'm
> retired and therefore have more time to indulge in the extra issues.
>
> Jack
>
I approve - I'm happy to end that side-track here.
Kind regards,
Regner
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Regner Trampedach" <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 10:45 AM
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: disturbing deceit!
>
> SNIP
> 1
> > Absolutely besides my point. How would we have been able to do those
> > things if scientists have no idea what they are doing. The bible doesn't
> > tell how to build a computer. Do you not believe in a computer because
> > you wouldn't know how to build one yourself?
>
> SNIP
> 2
> > And the highly succesful theory of evolution has never and will never say
> > anything about how life started. Why is that so hard to understand?!?!?
> > And it is not the foundation of evolution either.
> >
> > - Regner
> >>
> >> Jack
>
>
Other related posts:
