[geocentrism] Re: Supposed geostationary satellites

  • From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:56:18 -0700 (PDT)

Japan lauches them Russia, China, and EU all do it regularly.
"Dr. Neville Jones" <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Allen,

The "evidence" that I asked you to provide me with is therefore that "Many 
countries have them." How many countries have LAUNCHED them? Could you do some 
research for me?

Neville.

Allen Daves wrote:
"If these things exist, as I've said before, then
geocentrism is finished." I am still not sure why you think one has anything to 
do with the other. It is almost a certainty that Geosationary satellites do 
exist. Many countries have them. That statement seems to me to assume either 
you are right or everything including the Bible and everyone is wrong. That 
would assume a near perfect understanding, which is what we don't have. However 
to suggest there are no other possibilities unless you can find them reasonable 
seems to be the same approach the world has taken with God. And if you find out 
that they do exist, what then, you are left with either one of two options. 
Proclaim that plain scripture is unreasonable or you will have to conclude that 
your reasoning was unreasonable to begin with and what you now consider as 
unreasonable, as possible if not probable. Any good ground base telescope, in 
the right location, should be able to verify that they do in fact exist all 
over the world operated by several countries. However, t
hey
still have to be adjusted from time to time. I think your statements here are 
far too reaching based on too little.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 






Other related posts: