[geocentrism] Re: Setterfield, CDK and ZPE
- From: "Gary Shelton" <garylshelton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 00:25:17 -0600
Robert,
If the earth is not slowing down, then to what do you ascribe this adding of a
second? Aren't these atomic clocks supposed to be more accurate than a second
in 300,000 years? It couldn't be because they are inaccurate, right?
Would I be correct in saying this shows "c" is slowing down, ala Setterfield?
Gary Shelton
GaryLShelton@xxxxxxxxxxx
-- No attachments (even text) are allowed --
-- Type: text/plain
-- Desc: "AVG certification"
Other related posts:
- » [geocentrism] Setterfield, CDK and ZPE
- » [geocentrism] Re: Setterfield, CDK and ZPE
- » [geocentrism] Re: Setterfield, CDK and ZPE
- » [geocentrism] Re: Setterfield, CDK and ZPE
- » [geocentrism] Re: Setterfield, CDK and ZPE
- » [geocentrism] Re: Setterfield, CDK and ZPE
- » [geocentrism] Re: Setterfield, CDK and ZPE
- » [geocentrism] Re: Setterfield, CDK and ZPE
- » [geocentrism] Re: Setterfield, CDK and ZPE
- » [geocentrism] Re: Setterfield, CDK and ZPE
- » [geocentrism] Re: Setterfield, CDK and ZPE
- » [geocentrism] Re: Setterfield, CDK and ZPE
- » [geocentrism] Re: Setterfield, CDK and ZPE
- » [geocentrism] Re: Setterfield, CDK and ZPE
- » [geocentrism] Re: Setterfield, CDK and ZPE
- » [geocentrism] Re: Setterfield, CDK and ZPE
- » [geocentrism] Re: Setterfield, CDK and ZPE
- » [geocentrism] Re: Setterfield, CDK and ZPE
- » [geocentrism] Re: Setterfield, CDK and ZPE