[geocentrism] Re: plenum effects atmosphere?
- From: "Philip" <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:42:06 +1000
The crucial difference between 'boundary' and 'limit' is what??
Would 'interface' suit your fancy? Pax Christi, Robert
Yes, if the interface were flexible as someone said , limits being the extreme
end of the flexibility.. I can accept your surface of the errth and seas, as
being a limit, with flexibility for the bulges LOL.
Phil.
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Bennett
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2005 2:53 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: plenum effects atmosphere?
Neville just agreed the plenum is down to at least the surface; now you're
out of step. ~(:^)>
Yes, the f = the p.
Don't the clouds touch the surface in the mountains, or fog in the valleys?
Yes, a boundary above the atmosphere conflicts with Scripture, which is why
it's rejected.
The crucial difference between 'boundary' and 'limit' is what??
Would 'interface' suit your fancy?
Pax Christi,
Robert
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Philip
> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 6:05 PM
> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: plenum effects atmosphere?
>
>
> Yes, the Hebrew term 'paniym' means in front of, on the face of.
> So the open sky is the face of the firmament - the lower visible part -
> clouds, blue sky, etc.
> Pax Christi,
>
> Robert
> Is the firmament the plenum? thus then if so the plenum boundry
> is above the atmosphere. does this not then conflict with waters
> to waters.. although above the waers, or even between the
> waters does not necessarily set boundaries... just limits.... Phil
>
>
Other related posts:
