[geocentrism] Re: Setterfield, CDK and ZPE

  • From: "Robert Bennett" <robert.bennett@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:47:21 -0500

Gary,

Scripture doesn't tell us to use the speed of light to keep time.

Atomic clocks are used with the assumption that Einstein's SRT is correct -
c is constant.
Then when c is measured with an atomic clock, which depends on c for the
precise frequency count .... surprise! it is found that c is constant !
Do you see the tautology/ circular reasoning? What measures c must be
independent of c.

Is c slowing down?  Measure it with a dynamic clock.

for a description of atomic clock assumptions  this reference may help
http://www.ineunte.com/model/time.htm


Pax Christi,

Robert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Gary Shelton
> Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2005 1:25 AM
> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Setterfield, CDK and ZPE
>
>
>    Robert,
> If the earth is not slowing down, then to what do you ascribe
> this adding of a second?  Aren't these atomic clocks supposed to
> be more accurate than a second in 300,000 years?  It couldn't be
> because they are inaccurate, right?
>
> Would I be correct in saying this shows "c" is slowing down, ala
> Setterfield?
>
> Gary Shelton
> GaryLShelton@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> -- No attachments (even text) are allowed --
> -- Type: text/plain
> -- Desc: "AVG certification"
>
>
>
>

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. geocentrism
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2005