[geocentrism] Re: Challenge
- From: Alan Griffin <ajg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 17:17:45 +0100
On 07 Aug, Steven Jones <stavro_jones@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Unfortunately you still do not seem to be able to understand how the
> modified Tychonic Model accounts for aberration, even though you
> mentioned the possibility of the stars being an equal distance away in a
> previous posting. The simplest solution that I will supply you with at
> present, is that all the stars are roughly the same distance away.
Well that is an even more ridiculous suggestion, since their
distances can be measured, and it is a known fact that the stars are at
different distances.
>
> As regards me proving you wrong concerning stellar parallax, I seem to
> recall you admitting that the >ridiculous theory where the stars go
> round every 24 hours" does account for the phenomena.
No it doesn't ACCOUNT for the phenomenon. If the stars did go
round the sun every 24 hours it would produce the change in radial
velocity, but since it is not possible that the stars do this, because
there are no forces which could cause it, and the stars would have to be
travelling faster than light, the theory is a non starter.
Alan Griffin
Other related posts:
