I look at it this way, as long as the text on the page is good, keep it. I
wonder if there has been a study done on how many people use the daisy
reader versus kurzweil and open book.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jake Brownell" <jabrown@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 3:56 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Clarifying the stripper and page number issue
for Monday Meeting
Pam, Good point and I don't think BookShare is ready to reject books on the basis of no page numbers. The issue I would like to see resolved is simply that we shouldn't destroy (get rid of) the page numbers that we do have available. Why make something less good?
Jake
----- Original Message ----- From: "Pam Quinn" <quinns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 3:50 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Clarifying the stripper and page number issue
for Monday Meeting
But sometimes page numbers have been known not to scan. So even though books are rejected if they don't have page breaks, I wouldn't want this to be the case if there were no page numbers.
Pam
-- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.0 - Release Date: 3/31/2005
