Try here instead : http://www.oyranos.org/wiki/index.php?title=ICC_Examin/Download Look toward the bottom of the page for Mac OSX. Roger De : argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Andrea Barbieri Envoyé : 6 janvier 2009 07:08 À : argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Objet : [argyllcms] Re: i need some suggestion calibration/profiling. forgot the icc On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Andrea Barbieri <andrea.barbieri01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: So be patient if my poor english will leave me along this mail. The goal is squeeze out the most i could of my two monitors, are two eizo, S1931 and the other is a cg222w Spec, if usefull to know the "victims" s1931 Brightness: 280 cd/m2 Contrast ratio: 1000:1 LUT 10bit. not specified the color but if i remember well 72% ntsc the cg222w Brightness: 200 cd/m2 Contrast ratio: 800:1 LUT 12bit 16bit processing. 92% Adobe RGB i do photography, my envirment is not the optimal, is dim (i could work on photo only on night) the output is for printing, (as soon as i buy a good printer) and for a gallery online. I suppose the two must be differently calibrated one to match as close as possible to the adobe rgb (the 222) and the other the srgb i typically have the brightness around 80 100 cd/m. or the lut is always better? would someone help me out find the best dispcal option for my needs? the settings i've used by now is lcd-t6500-b80-G2.2-f0-k0-qhh-lut for both, using dispcal gui (is so nice), i noticed on a testchart this http://www.fc-prints.de/fileadmin/daten/fcPrints_Testbild_100ppi.jpg i loose a from 1 to 3 on blacks.. white is ok. Colour seems the same, (more "rich" on the cg222) and, maybe there's a little warm shift on the 1931, but i couldn't understand why. What is important for me smooth color transition, and the rendition for the b&w photo, so more precise are the grays levels more i'm happy.. i've attached my 2 icm.. i don't know how to see the the gamut chart or the curve (a free apps for windows?) thanks for any help