[argyllcms] Re: i need some suggestion calibration/profiling.

  • From: Roger <graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:28:53 -0500

Dear Andrea,

 

If you are on a Mac, you can see the gamut using a (free) tool like ICC
Examin.

 

http://www.oyranos.org/#icc_examin

 

To me, LUT is always better, by the way.

 

And I would not use brightness lower than 90 cd/m2.

 

By S1931, you mean the 1931 2 degrees Standard Observer?

 

Keep up your good English!

 

Roger Breton

 

De : argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
De la part de Andrea Barbieri
Envoyé : 6 janvier 2009 07:08
À : argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Objet : [argyllcms] Re: i need some suggestion calibration/profiling.

 

forgot the icc 

On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Andrea Barbieri
<andrea.barbieri01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

So be patient if my  poor english will leave me along this mail. 

The goal is squeeze out the most i could of my two monitors, 
are two eizo, S1931 and the other is a cg222w 

Spec, if usefull to know the "victims"
s1931 

Brightness: 280 cd/m2

Contrast ratio: 1000:1

LUT 10bit.

not specified the color but if i remember well 72% ntsc

 

the cg222w 

Brightness: 200 cd/m2

Contrast ratio: 800:1

LUT 12bit 16bit processing.

92% Adobe RGB

 

i do photography, my envirment is not the optimal, is dim (i could work on
photo only on night) 

the output is for printing, (as soon as i buy a good printer) and  for a
gallery online.

I suppose the two must be differently calibrated one to match as close as
possible to the adobe rgb (the 222) and the other the srgb

i typically have the brightness around 80 100 cd/m. or  the lut is always
better?

 

 

would someone help me out find the best dispcal option for my needs? 
the settings i've used by now is lcd-t6500-b80-G2.2-f0-k0-qhh-lut for both,
using dispcal gui (is so nice), i noticed on a testchart this
http://www.fc-prints.de/fileadmin/daten/fcPrints_Testbild_100ppi.jpg

i loose a from 1 to 3 on blacks..  white is ok. 

Colour seems the same, (more "rich" on the cg222) and, maybe  there's a
little warm shift on the 1931, but i couldn't understand why. 


What is important for me smooth color transition, and the rendition for the
b&w photo, so more precise are the grays levels more i'm happy..

 

i've attached my 2 icm.. i don't know how to see the the gamut chart or the
curve  (a free apps for windows?) 

 

thanks for any  help 

 

 

 

Other related posts: