[argyllcms] Re: i need some suggestion calibration/profiling.
- From: "edmund ronald" <edmundronald@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 20:43:09 +0100
And a new star is born !
I'm starting to get the point of these group sessions. Who wants to share next ?
Oh, and by the way, best wishes of a Happy New Year to all of you, in
all of your dispersed countries.
Edmund
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Andrea Barbieri
<andrea.barbieri01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes i'm aware of color eyes, basicc color, color navigator that come into
> the Eizo cd...and one match work, is not dead is alive and in producton
> maybe not the best, but harware is the same of display2, software cutted, as
> xrite say on theyr website..
>
>
> And i know there's better calibrator, maybe a spyder3, or i find one the
> dtp94 old but "gold", or color munki (that's i discovered hardware is an
> isis,Graem could i don't know if you know that.. could be usefull to you for
> drivers?)
> or there's the Lafot Monitor control Lmc03 from jenoptic/matzen, (is the
> one i'm more thinking about seems to outperform any other on the market..but
> is not supported by Argyll and not diffused.).
>
> but coming back to argyll....
>
> I choose Argyll for some reason,
> 1) in theory could outperform any other software, customizable, in all
> parameters, from patches to profondity of the icc.. i suppose but i could
> only suppose due to my poor knowledge, using argyll one could correct any
> deviation from a wanted delta... for colour.. (example i noticed that with
> color nav, i'm under delta 1 but a gray is 0.94, and that's a deviation, i
> suppose could be corrected, +to say something*. "" forcing more gray
> patches, to correct the deviation.""
>
> 2)i choose argyll cause is free and open source, so in theory, could grown
> more fast, and implement in future things others wouldn't or that will cost
> to end user a lot, maybe that way one lost some functionality, like ddc, and
> a lot of bells and whistles, but if there's something new, Graem could
> implement new things more fast than others.
>
> 3) i think i could learn, is not only the software and the hardware, is the
> knowledge that pass, the real usefull thing,tips and tricks, knoledge in how
> one have to do things to meet a result and so on.
>
> Maybe i'm wrong.
>
> :D
> in truth i started this topic in search of suggestion, about argyll
> parameters to use, someone that check if there's something wrong in the icc
> produced using settings i've used, tips to do the things right, to reach the
> goal..
> Really thanks for the patience..
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:43 AM, Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Andrea Barbieri wrote:
>>
>>> Graem is a pity you are not near here, or i will let you "play" with the
>>> cg222.
>>> But maybe a stupid thing to think,but writing two words to eizo? maybe
>>> they
>>> could give you the needed specifics.. in order to implement ddc..
>>> for Eizo is always a free advertising, "support" an opensource project.
>>
>> That sort of thing doesn't seem to interest most companies, since open
>> source stuff is very small compared to the usage of their gear on
>> MSWindows etc., and they seem to be more interested in "proprietary
>> advantage"
>> than making things work well, or giving customers flexibility.
>> [ Exactly how one can have some advantage in hiding how to set three
>> lookup tables inside a monitor rather than on the graphics card
>> is not something I claim to understand...]
>>
>> Just having the information, or access to a monitor isn't really viable
>> in the long run. Every software release needs testing.
>>
>> Graeme Gill.
>>
>
>
Other related posts:
