On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Pedro Côrte-Real <pedro@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> It's also worth experimenting with other source profiles - despite the >> common advice to avoid the bastardized Version 2 sRGB profiles like the >> plague, using the black_scaled version from this page: >> http://www.color.org/srgbprofiles.xalter >> gives markedly different results, and in some situations I've found it helps >> with garish saturated dark colours and skin tones. As always >> experimentation is the key. Just make sure you use whichever profile you >> select consistently - i.e. use the same one with colprof's -S parameter and >> in PhotoPrint's colour management dialog. Just tried this and the result was the same. >> If your skin tones are still way off after trying all this, then your >> problem is likely to be profile accuracy, so the answer may then be to hack >> some extra skin-tone patches into a .ti1 file manually, using a spreadsheet. > > I'm guessing that is probably it. I guess I have to study the ti1 > format and write my own with some different colors. I was expecting > this to be more straightforward. Oh, well. Is the 200patch run I did too little? I only did 2 pages to not waste too much paper but if I do a calibration with say 6 pages or around 600 patches will this be much better or should I hack in skin tones specifically? Pedro