Pedro Côrte-Real wrote:
So basing one profile on a previous one just biases the patch color selection, it doesn't use previous patches. Wouldn't it make sense to have an incremental mode where you do as many patches as will fit on a page for that instrument, read them and then generate the next page and repeat as many times as wanted? Seems like the most efficient use of paper/ink.
Possibly, but it's a rather specialized approach, and would need a number of changes to accomplish. The knowledge of whether a previous profile is merely "like" the current device or is "exactly" the current device is something the user knows, but Argyll doesn't assume. So a means of specifying this situation and carrying the information about in a reliable fashion would be needed. Graeme Gill.