[argyllcms] Re: Awful result with Argyll 1.3.5 + dispcalGUI 0.8 + i1Display Pro & Dell U2711 :-(((
- From: Paolo Avezzano <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 06:36:10 +0100
Thanks Graeme,
actually I've pasted and discussed the settings I used and the results I got
several times.
I'm using dispcalGUI because it's easier to launch the process in a few clicks.
As written before, the readings are different right before the start of
calibration: white level, white point, black level, RGB slider values… all very
different.
Moreover, right after the profile creation every verify returns bad average dE.
In the end I already tried tens of combinations, I'm not a complete newbie. 😄
It could be a software problem too, for what it seems.
Thanks anyway,
Paolo Avezzano
Il giorno 16/gen/2012, alle ore 01:39, Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ha
scritto:
> Paolo Avezzano wrote:
>> After a number of test with quite a few combination of settings and just
>> poor results on grey
>> gradient and patches I decide to give up for now. Sorry to say that but
>> i1Profiler "just works",
>> as Steve would have said. It may not be the best calibration overall, but
>> it's predictable and
>> good in quality.
>
> Hi,
> it's a pity you've given up before providing any concrete information
> to go on. It's not clear to me for instance whether the problem is in
> calibration
> or profiling, what parameters you were using for both, whether the profile is
> the
> simple one from dispcal or the more sophisticate result from colprof.
>
> If it's the calibration, then the dispcal parameters + output of dispcal -v2
> would
> be a good place to start in understanding what the problem is, together with
> some spot readings of the resultign grey patch values from dispwin -m,
> say starting with an absolute reading of the white, and then
> using spotread -dw from white to black.
>
> Graeme Gill.
>
Other related posts:
