On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 21:46 +0200, edmund ronald wrote: > Fréderic, > > I'm sorry, there is something here I don't understand: If I > ***REQUIRE*** unchanging semantics as far as possible, bugs and all, > can I enforce that without static linking ? I'm sorry, but unchanging does not exist (and I've worked with people who stockpiled components in nitrogen for decades). You either learn to manage changes or hit a big painful brick wall sooner or later. -- Nicolas Mailhot