[argyllcms] Re: Argyllcms 1.0.1 packaged in fedora-devel
- From: "Frederic Crozat" <fred@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:56:12 +0200
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 9:46 PM, edmund ronald <edmundronald@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Fréderic,
>
> I'm sorry, there is something here I don't understand: If I
> ***REQUIRE*** unchanging semantics as far as possible, bugs and all,
> can I enforce that without static linking ?
>
> Please understand that some anonymous contributor "fixing" a library
> may cause a different instrument reading on some systems, which to an
> instrument maker is a serious problem.
Well, that means there is a lack of regression tests in the library.
But I understand your concerns, specially regarding access to physical
device. My point is more generic (but it
works for other kind of devices and libraries, like digital cameras or
scanners).
OTOH, sharing the changes and getting them merged faster, with
versions releases (and beta versions) can help detect those
regressions.
--
Frederic Crozat
Other related posts:
