Hi James.I take some of your points here but would take great issue with your statement that most major companies run their servers on Linux - that is just simply wrong. The major companies of the developed world use combinations of IBM midrange and mainframe computers with Microsoft Windows as their server base. There have been a few flirtations with Linux by companies and organisations looking to save on licensing but that's nothing to do with some in-built prejudice that Microsoft are too successful.
As far as whether one O/S is perfect or more perfect than the other, that really doesn't come into it. The fact is that Microsoft have already stolen a march on Apple and have covered the planet. Organisations will not go out and change their whole infrastructure on some vague promise that you wil pay more now and save later. The initial costs in decommissioning existing infrastructure, installing new, finding and testing applications to replace those currently in place, if they exist of course, and then sorting out licensing would turn most board rooms into quivering wrecks at just the thought. Especially in times where there is little investment in infrastructure, I'm sorry to say that really is pie in the sky.
Admire your brand loyalty and enthusiasm though. In my opinion, Mac users should continue to sell the benefits but stop trying to argue the case that the Mac will ever replace Microsoft's O/S. The truth is that Microsoft is big enough and powerful enough to flex to any competition anyway if it was seriously threatened. They haven't had to yet and I don't expect they will any time soon. Even the most devoted Mac users generally have Windows there to fall back on when it's needed so the true test will be when those Mac users stop loading Windows onto their Macs and send their Windows boxes to be recycled.
Regards. Kevin E-mail: kevin.lloyd3@xxxxxxx----- Original Message ----- From: "James & Nash" <james.austin1984@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 3:28 PMSubject: [access-uk] Re: Accessibilty and the iPad: First Impressions | ATMac
Hi kevin,I used to think the way you do - that the Mac was just for publishers etc, but I've had interesting experiences since then. The Mac has always had accessibility in thir products - right from the early days - but I was not around then, so i can't speak for that personally.Your comments regarding employment and the use of Windows are very true - but just because the market uses something as the norm, does not mean that it is the best way forward businesses to continue. If they only took some time to explore alternatives, they might see that although they might being paying out more initially, their future Apple computers would probably last them a lot longer. Also, there is a very good reason why many companies do not use Windows to run their servers - it's because Windows was not designed for that sort of thing and it sucks at doing it. Linux is generally the choice for many large businesses deploying servers.As I said, more and more blind people are using the Mac - some as their primary home computer and some are even fortunate enough to work an environment where Macs are used. However, it is possible that many companies in the future may not use either Apple or Microsoft but opt for Linux. In fact, the Danish parliament have recently snubed Microsoft by ditching their .doc and .docx format and using the of (Open Document Format). They have expressed a desire to run all of their agencies on open source software as they see it as the way forward and also because they are dismayed at Microsoft's monopolisation of the market. Competition is great, but it is becoming harder and harder to foster. In fact, in Germany, I think it was, Mozilla Firefox has outstripped Internet Explorer use and in other nations, Mozilla's market share has increased catching up Microsoft.Interestingly, Apple has also produced Safari for Windows, but I don't know how many users it has. I agree, there are certainly issues being locked into a company's platform - but that is what we have all been doing for years with Microsoft. People really need to explore other alternatives before decrying them. Apple is not perfect, nor is Linux, but - nor is the All Mighty Microsoft.TC James, Lyn, Nash & Twinny On 31 Jan 2010, at 14:54, Kevin Lloyd wrote:It's easy to see why Apple have adopted their approach with VoiceOver when you bear in mind that the company did nothing for accessibility of their services and products up until the last 5 years. The picture was very different back in the mid to early 90's when Microsoft started working with adaptive technology vendors to ensure visually impaired users weren't excluded from using the O/S and from the job market. Perhaps with many years hindsight and riding on the back of another companies R & D then Microsoft may have done more with Narrator. You can surely understand why Microsoft aren't going to put enormous effort into that field now though with such mature offerings as JAWS and Window-Eyes and then the emerging free screen readers pushing them hard. That would be a ridiculous waste of time and money that could be spent elsewhere.Apple have a very loyal brand following, much like any niche product manufacturer but it's a real exageration to say that there are huge numbers of blind people taking up the Mac as their only computer or even primary computer. Rightly or wrongly, I view the Mac and most Apple products as very well designed and manufactured and marketed even better but, unless you are a a publisher or audio producer, it's more of a luxury toy than a tool.You won't be joining the "mainstream" by buying a Mac because it has an in built screen reader, you will be joining a niche group of enthusiasts which, if I remember correctly, still makes up only 8 percent of the market. Like it or not, mainstream is the Windows operating system even though you need some very functional adaptive technology to "bolt on".In the wider scheme of things, how many blind and partially sighted people will use the Mac O/S at work? For those currently not in work, how impressed would most prospective employers be if you were to turn up to a job interview and tell them you'd lost touch a little with MS applications and adaptive technology but you have a beautiful looking bit of Apple kit at home?I certainly wouldn't recommend any visually impaired person moving over to Apple for the reasons above but could understand if they wanted to buy a Mac as a second, luxury gadget.Kevin E-mail: kevin.lloyd3@xxxxxxx----- Original Message ----- From: "James & Nash" <james.austin1984@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 12:51 PMSubject: [access-uk] Re: Accessibilty and the iPad: First Impressions | ATMacHi Steve,If the rumours are true, then that is exactly what MS tried to do and were stopped by NFB i believe because they worried that it would be bad for the Screen Reader manufacturers. I am all for competition, but these companies are only interested in their bottom line - making a profit for themselves. Surely, if they were really interested in assistinb Blind people, they would sell their products for less and so sell more, eventually making more money which would satisfy them I'm sure. As I've said, Apple's products are at the higher end of the price range, but by including Voice Over they have dramatically changed the face of commercial and AT computing. The Windows Screen Reaer manufacturers need to sit up and take notice because Apple id what Microsoft did not and I think MS should have gone down that root.I am not personally attacking anyone, but I think it would indeed be sad for AT venders such as yourself, because if Microsoft provided their own Screen Reader, that would severely decrease profits. Especially in the case of FS and other Screen Reader manufacturers. It may not be so bad for you, as I believe you sell other products besides Window-Eyes. I do think though, that if you sold Macs, you would see your business increase, at least to a point, because more and more Blind people are buying Macs exactly for the reasons that Lyn and others have given. I am not saying that some of them do not keep their Windows machines too or that they don't put Windows on their Macs - and why not, but Apple has seen its market share increase among the Blind in recent years. I don't know how many lists you are on, but why don't you join Mac Visionaries just so you can get an idea of how things really do work. Also, Do you have any way of actually using a Mac yourself? That would be the best way for you to form conclusions. I am not saying that everyone should use Macs - far from it - people should use what they feel comfortable with and/or what their circumstances dictate, but at least that way, you could get some first-hand experience.TC James, Lyn, Nash & Twinny On 31 Jan 2010, at 11:39, Steve Nutt wrote:Hi Hussein, I totally agree with Ibrahim. It is all right to complain about overpricing, but how does one recoup costs for development? And ifMicrosoft built in a screen reader like Apple and it became the only choice,how sad that would be. All the best Steve -----Original Message-----From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf OfHussein Patwa Sent: Sunday 31 January 2010 09:56 To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [access-uk] Re: Accessibilty and the iPad: First Impressions | ATMac Wow Ibrahim, enthusiastic much? 'grin'. _______________________________________ Have a pleasant day, Kind Regards and Best Wishes, Hussein. Hussein Patwa Tel: 0789 47 595 62 (UK) Tel: +44 (0)122 4433 954 (SIP) Twitter: www.twitter.com/hussein_patwa Skype: patwaspotterfan2 GoogleTalk: thewanderingwriter Web: www.patwanet.co.uk My Blog: http://patwaspotterfan.livejournal.com Find me on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=510013486 Please note: For security reasons calls from witheld numbers may not beconnected. Please release your number so it can be viewed prior to calling.Contact your telephone service provider for advice on how to do this if required. All calls may be recorded for fact verification. DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential or sensitiveinformation and are intended solely for the stated recipient(s). Copying or distribution in any form is not permitted without the prior consent of the sender. If you have received this message in error, please delete it andany attachments from your system and notify the sender immediately. Thank you for your co-operation.Protect our trees; Do not print unless absolutely necessary. Save paper bydeleting sections of the message which are not relevant. -----Original Message-----From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf OfIbrahim Gucukoglu Sent: 31 January 2010 07:56 To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [access-uk] Re: Accessibilty and the iPad: First Impressions | ATMac Hi Lyn.Hang on a second. You talk of over priced screen readers when you don'trealize yet all they can do. Does voice over on the Mac or IPhone have scripting capability? NO! Do they have Braille support? no! (exceptinggrade one on the Mac). Also, you fail to take in to account the massive selection of screen readers on pc's. OK, jaws and window-eyes are the most common and at a higher price range, but System Access, NVDA and Narrator areeither inexpensive or free, providing varying degrees of accessibility to windows and its applications. With the Mac and IPhone, you have the onescreen reader take it or leave it, and to my mind if you've only onedeveloper IE Apple who's primary concern isn't accessibility, you've got serious problems. FS and GW Micro spend hundreds of thousands of dollars and many man hours developing their products to meet the ever more growing and complex demands of their customers. Think what you like, but please don't fall over to promote apple and praise them as you would the lord justbecause they give you a built in screen reader. All the best, Ibrahim.----- Original Message ----- From: "Lyn & Twinny" <keanemaniac@xxxxxxxxx>To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 7:26 AM Subject: [access-uk] Re: Accessibilty and the iPad: First Impressions | ATMacJames & tony,well said...no further comments to add after this. Hats off to Apple andI know here, more and more blind people are showing interest in Mac OSX andapple's built in accessibility.We have been ripped off all these years with overly priced products that very few of us can afford anyway ifgovernment agencies don't provide us with those products. FS, GW Micro and all these other companies that supposedly aim at making life easier for blind people should be ashamed of themselves. At last now, we have choice and as far as I am concerned, (and this is the case with more and more of us here) we are going to stop buying these overly prices screen readers. There are so many advantages to using the Mac and all of them have been listed in James and Tony's message so I won't write any furtheron this subject. but you guys said it all. Lyn & Twinny *********** "One day in your life You'll remember the love you found here You'll remember me somehow Though you don't need me now I will stay in your heart And when things fall apart You'll remember one day..."(How can we forget you Michael, a gentle soul like yours will forever liveon!) *********** MSN and Email= keanemaniac@xxxxxxxxx skype= keanemaniac You can find me on facebook www.facebook.com/Lyn.33.bordeaux. ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4821 (20100130) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signaturedatabase 4821 (20100130) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signaturedatabase 4821 (20100130) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. Email message - is OK http://www.eset.com__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signaturedatabase 4821 (20100130) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. Email message - is OK http://www.eset.com ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq