--- On Tue, 3/23/10, iro3isdx <wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm surprised to see you taking that part seriously. > It's a bullshit answer. If Searle does not have a better response > that that to the Systems Reply, then Searle does not have an answer to > the Systems Reply. How do you respond to his answer to the systems reply? -gts ========================================= Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/