Cayuse wrote: >Joseph Polanik wrote: >>I am asserting that 'I experience' is true. >>I also assert 'I experience afterimages'. when I am in fact >>experiencing an afterimage, I assert 'I am experiencing an afterimage' >>on the other hand, it seems that you have adopted some bizarre rule of >>grammar that prevents you from reporting afterimages. is that true? if >>not, how would you state a first person report of experiencing an >>afterimage? >You can assert that the claim "I experience" is true, just like you can >assert that the claim "the moon is made of green cheese" is true, >but that doesn't make it true. similarly, if your only evidence that the claim 'I experience' is neither true nor false is the fact that you say so; then, you've got no evidence at all. >I can report "I see an afterimage" as a mode of common speech I am experiencing an afterimage is also a common mode of speech (and one that doesn't depend on a metaphorical interpretation of 'seeing'). >this mode of speech confuses two different language games, and thereby >misleads the unawary into thinking there is an "experiencer" of that >afterimage. if reporting "I see an afterimage" is an accurate report; then, would you kindly explain why "I am experiencing an afterimage" is not an accurate report of experiencing an afterimage? Joe -- Nothing Unreal is Self-Aware @^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@ http://what-am-i.net @^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@ ========================================== Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/