[Wittrs] Re: On Wittgenstein and Originality

  • From: "jrstern" <jrstern@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 02:09:38 -0000

--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Glen Sizemore <gmsizemore2@...> wrote:
>
> that behaviorism is silly?" Stern's was the best, though, and I
> have heard it before - Skinner isn't really even a behaviorist.

Did I say that Skinner isn't really even a behaviorist?
I don't think so.  Can't imagine why I would want to.

Oh, or is it *you* saying Skinner isn't really even a behaviorist,
because you say and show that he did not limit himself to the
eliminative aspects of behaviorism that are most in question.

The later I guess.

Just clarifying out loud.

Josh




WEB VIEW: http://tinyurl.com/ku7ga4
TODAY: http://alturl.com/whcf
3 DAYS: http://alturl.com/d9vz
1 WEEK: http://alturl.com/yeza
GOOGLE: http://groups.google.com/group/Wittrs
YAHOO: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Wittrs/
FREELIST: //www.freelists.org/archive/wittrs/09-2009

Other related posts: