[Wittrs] Re: On Wittgenstein and Originality
- From: Glen Sizemore <gmsizemore2@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:34:52 -0700 (PDT)
--- On Sun, 9/20/09, jrstern <jrstern@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: jrstern <jrstern@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Wittrs] Re: On Wittgenstein and Originality
> To: wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Sunday, September 20, 2009, 10:09 PM
> --- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> Glen Sizemore <gmsizemore2@...> wrote:
> >
> > that behaviorism is silly?" Stern's was the best,
> though, and I
> > have heard it before - Skinner isn't really even a
> behaviorist.
>
> Did I say that Skinner isn't really even a behaviorist?
> I don't think so. Can't imagine why I would want to.
Yes, you did. And I can see why you would want to.
>
> Oh, or is it *you* saying Skinner isn't really even a
> behaviorist,
> because you say and show that he did not limit himself to
> the
> eliminative aspects of behaviorism that are most in
> question.
>
> The later I guess.
No, you have defined "behaviorism" in a way that doesn't include Skinner's
view. Thus, you are saying that Skinner is not a behaviorist. No?
>
> Just clarifying out loud.
>
> Josh
>
>
>
>
> WEB VIEW: http://tinyurl.com/ku7ga4
> TODAY: http://alturl.com/whcf
> 3 DAYS: http://alturl.com/d9vz
> 1 WEEK: http://alturl.com/yeza
> GOOGLE: http://groups.google.com/group/Wittrs
> YAHOO: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Wittrs/
> FREELIST: //www.freelists.org/archive/wittrs/09-2009
>
>
Other related posts:
