[tinwhiskers] Re: IPC Survey Reveals Electronics Industry Not Prepared for REACH

  • From: "Bob Landman" <rlandman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 12:42:54 -0400

Mark,

Thanks for the clarification but which "ton" are they speaking about in Reach?  
Short ton, Long ton, metric tonne?   How many pounds/kilos is it?  Our units 
weigh 100 lbs.  Keep us posted on this.

Bob




From: tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Vaughan
Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 6:19 AM
To: tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tinwhiskers] Re: IPC Survey Reveals Electronics Industry Not Prepared 
for REACH 


Reach is one area where the really little firms won?t suffer, under one ton 
imported per annum and registration isn?t required. At least that?s what the UK 
Gov?t?s telling us.
However even if managers are a little aware the information as to what 
companies have to do; is very vague and advice is very mixed. 
As part of a group of manufacturers in the southwest of England, we?ve asked 
for further advice from Gov?t, they don?t know either.
 
The EU?s aim is to try to get a better idea of what chemicals are being used, 
in what products, perhaps a reasonable aim, initially just a database but later 
to be used so any risks can be identified and investigated.
 
This database is going to take a long time to procure and build if data isn?t 
available, and in our trade very few suppliers have a clue whats in the 
components they supply. There are various risks:-
1 The EU will at a later stage see a chemical name and decide to ban it?s use 
no matter how critical it is, we are already suffering from these sort of knee 
jerk reactions with Pb. In essence you cannot trust the logic of what appear to 
be a bunch of illogical greeny politicians. 
2 If it takes a long time to collect accurate data we may have some protection 
gap before knee jerk reactions, a hundred years seem good right now.
3 If they legislate to force data to be provided by a data, it will be 
inaccurate.
With COSHH and HSE we see many products have been labelled as risky just in 
case they are so the manufacturer is safe, you now don?t know what is 100% 
carcinogen or 1 part per billion. We are liable to see chemicals listed in 
products that just aren?t there, or with very suspect quantities.
For electronics companies, and other non chemical manufacturers as industries 
we have very few chemists, this again will either lead to wrong data, or 
expensive consultants probably still applying wrong data but getting paid more. 
The UK Gov?t sent around free consultants to firms for RoHs and WEE, much of 
their advice was wrong, and they are absolved of liability if they are wrong, 
you still carry the can, not much use at the end of the day.
 
If the EU?s aim for REACH is to work, the data needs to be accurate. If they 
push this hard the data will be useless. I would hope under very basic logic 
they cannot deny this fact.
We could use this in various ways to our advantage.
 
Regs Mark 
 
Dr. Mark Vaughan Ph'D., B.Eng. M0VAU
Managing Director
Vaughan Industries Ltd., reg in UK no 2561068
Water Care Technology Ltd, reg in UK no 4129351
Addr Unit3, Sydney House, Blackwater, Truro, Cornwall, TR4 8HH UK.
Phone/Fax 44 (0) 1872 561288
RSGB DRM111 (Cornwall)



From: tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bob Landman
Sent: 02 August 2008 19:32
To: tin whiskers forum
Subject: [tinwhiskers] IPC Survey Reveals Electronics Industry Not Prepared for 
REACH 
 
http://www.circuitnet.com/articles/article_51276.shtml
 
July 29, 2008

IPC Survey Reveals Electronics Industry Not Prepared for REACH 
A full report on the results of IPC?s REACH preparedness survey is available on 
IPC?s website 
BANNOCKBURN, Ill., USA ? Like a bolt of lightning, the results of IPC?s recent 
survey on REACH Preparedness in the North American and European Interconnect 
Industry are striking ? revealing that more than 40 percent of manufacturing 
and purchasing personnel have no understanding of the REACH regulation as it 
affects their companies. The same holds true for nearly one-third of senior 
management and 29 percent of engineering personnel. Even 28 percent of 
environment, health and safety personnel have no understanding of REACH?s 
impact.
The new European Union (EU) legislation concerning the Registration, 
Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) took effect on 
June 1, 2007. The REACH regulation gives greater responsibility to industry to 
manage the risks from chemicals and to provide safety information on the 
substances.
In contrast to RoHS, which covers a narrow scope of substances in electronic 
products encompassing about 100 different chemicals, REACH covers substances in 
nearly all applications, totaling about 30,000 unique chemicals. While RoHS can 
address entire classes of substances at a time, REACH addresses them each 
individually. Where RoHS requires supplier-to-customer communications, the 
REACH regulation makes bidirectional communication throughout the supply chain 
imperative.
?REACH will have a far-reaching effect on any company that buys sells or uses 
chemicals,? said Tony Hilvers, vice president of industry programs for IPC. 
?Inevitably, all companies that use chemicals or make products that contain 
chemicals will be affected ?and that pretty much sums up the entire electronics 
supply chain. The survey clearly indicates that our industry is woefully 
unprepared for the hit it?s about to take.?
The electronic survey, sent to executives throughout the electronic 
interconnect supply chain in North America and Europe, reveals that even with a 
deadline for pre-registration of substances quickly approaching, only 18.3 
percent of companies have identified and/or inventoried all substances in their 
products. In addition only 60.5 percent of chemical supplier respondents are 
planning to register or pre-register substances at all.
Stepping up efforts to help electronics companies prepare for REACH, IPC has 
scheduled a number of programs in the coming months, including a REACH Critical 
Update Webcast on pre-registration issues for PCB and EMS suppliers, September 
18, 2008, 1:30 pm?3:30 pm, Central time. A number of sessions and meetings on 
REACH and other environmental issues will also take place at IPC Midwest 
Conference & Exhibition, September 21?25, 2008, at the Renaissance Schaumburg 
Hotel & Convention Center, Schaumburg, Ill. 
In addition, IPC has launched a REACH Supply Chain Task Force to help companies 
establish a path forward in addressing the impacts of REACH. Representatives 
from the OEM, EMS, PCB and supplier industries make up the task force. In a 
recent presentation to the task force, Design Chain Associates? President 
Michael Kirschner reiterated a warning from a large computer manufacturer that 
electronics executives should, ?As completely as possible, know what chemical 
substances your product is made of and with ? You eventually will be held 
responsible for every molecule of your product.?
A full report on the results of IPC?s REACH preparedness survey is available on 
IPC?s website at www.ipc.org/REACHsurveyreport. For more information about the 
study, contact Sharon Starr, IPC director of market research at +1 847-597-2817 
or sharonstarr@xxxxxxxx More information about the REACH Regulation can be 
found on IPC?s Environmental, Health and Safety webpage at www.ipc.org/EHS. For 
more information on the upcoming REACH webcast, contact Susan Filz, IPC 
director of industry programs at +1 847-597-2884 or susanfilz@xxxxxxxx For more 
information on the environmental programs at IPC Midwest, contact Fern Abrams, 
IPC director of government relations and environmental policy at +1 
703-522-0225 or fernabrams@xxxxxxx or visit http://www.ipcmidwestshow.org/.
Contact:
IPC 
Anna Garrido 
http://www.ipc.org/ 

Other related posts: