On lun, 2013-03-04 at 23:14 +0100, Alessio Parzian wrote: > @Federico asked me why choosing LGPL rather than GPL; Actually it was a question for the whole list :P > if I could decide I definitely opted for GPL just because I'm a > supporter of copy-left concept. Unfortunately classic GPL is too far > from our requirements, therefore following this philosophy, LGPLv2.1 > (quite similar to GPLv2) may fit. The issue is that we must choose our license basing our choice on the requirements (which are not totally clear to me). Anyway a license that is the most free as possible is the best imho because it fits more use cases if there's no clear vision of the far future of the project. > I would like to report the salient tips of GPLv2.1 license > [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-2.1.html]: In any case it's not clear to me which are the advantages of LGPL in our project. -- f. "There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors."
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
