[tdsoc] Re: license of our projects
- From: Lorenzo Nicolodi <lorenzo.nicolodi@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: tdsoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 21:32:51 +0100
thanks federico.
so apache2 seems more appropriate.... any other thought from you guys?
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Federico "fox" Scrinzi <fox91@xxxxxxxx>wrote:
> On sab, 2013-03-02 at 13:27 +0100, Lorenzo Nicolodi wrote:
>
> > the last step we need to accomplish is to decide which type of
> > opensource license our projects will use. we need something which
> > allows
> > everyone to use / modify our code for both free and commercial
> > open/closed source projects, if and only if they indicate us as the
> > source of the work.
>
> GPL and LGPL are not compliant with your requirements. If the software
> is modified and you use such licenses the third party must release the
> modifed version under the same license.
> So I think that the Apache license fits best (or BSD, MIT, ecc..).
>
>
> --
> f.
>
> "There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache
> invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors."
>
>
--
Lorenzo Nicolodi
Other related posts:
