[TCUG] Re: Vibrating tactile plates

  • From: "Tony Sharp" <Tony.Sharp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:20:42 -0000

Thanks for the clarification on this one Graham

Bit of an oversight 'excluding' HA from 165 don't 'we' think?=20
'If' we continue with BV 165 (and its by no means assured it will
'disappear') I think we should lobby for HA to be included ;o} (perhaps
if the HA were subject to the same 'rigor' as the LA's have been over
165 we would have had a bit more 'clarity' on the matter by now??)
Obviously any contrast would in addition to contrasting with the
carriageway also have to contrast with the tactile paving (and yes I
have seen sites where RED HFS has been put in leading to very little
definition between tactiles and the crossing!)=20

If a 'tactile plate' was installed anyone any idea over what spec it
would fall under?

Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: tcug-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tcug-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Graham_Bristo@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 28 November 2007 15:10
To: tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [TCUG] Re: Vibrating tactile plates

Tony,

Yes I was referring to tactile plates. I was simplifying the case for
brevity but my client, the Highways Agency, after consultation with
local sight concern wasn't happy with just tactile cones on a staggered
crossing and has tasked me to find something else (apart from bleep and
sweep) that could supplement / replace them. Sight concern were / are
quite happy with the tactiles, its one particular person who isn't.

Two things of interest came out of the meeting firstly that the main
complaint from sight concern was a lack of consistency of layouts /
designs across the area and secondly that they would find it helpful if
the area between studs had a strong contrast with rest of the
carriageway, say yellow anti skid for instance.

Fortunately as I work on behalf of the HA we appear to be exempt from
the vagaries of BV 165.

Regards

Graham Bristo
Senior Traffic Signal Engineer

///carillion-URS
HA area 8



=20

=20            "Tony Sharp"

=20            <Tony.Sharp@xxxxxxxxxxx

=20            ov.uk>
To=20
=20            Sent by:                        <tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

=20            tcug-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc=20
=20            rg

=20
Subject=20
=20                                            [TCUG] Re: Vibrating
tactile =20
=20            28/11/2007 14:53                plates

=20

=20

=20               Please respond to

=20              tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

=20

=20

=20





Graham,

New one on me!
Are you referring to a plate on the P/B or in the tactile paving?
At the risk of sounding to belligerent your client would be who? (the LA
in which case they should 'know better' or a third party who will want
the site adopted?) What is the objection to the use of tactile cones ?
Is it a maintenance issue (we have sought to get around this with
'brushless' BIC tactiles which 'if' a failure occurs still vibrate) Has
the idea of moving away from tactiles been cleared with the local
visually impaired group(s)and how will the 'non-standard' nature of this
site be communicated to such visually impaired users (we still have
trouble telling people about tactile cones although its not as bad as
when we first installed-15 years ago!) And last but by no means least
(and excuse me mentioning this one ) How the H are you going to convince
the audit commission that that site passes??

Tony

Anthony Sharp=3D20
Engineer (Traffic Signals)=3D20
Highways

South Gloucestershire Council=3D20
Broad lane, Yate BS37 7PN=3D20

Tel:    (01454) 86 3605=3D20
Fax:   (01454) 86 3757=3D20

Find out more about the work of the Highways Section at:
www.southglos.gov.uk/highways

=3D20



-----Original Message-----
From: tcug-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tcug-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Graham_Bristo@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 28 November 2007 14:43
To: tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [TCUG] Vibrating tactile plates


I've just been asked to look into providing these as my client doesn't
like the idea of cones. I have a vague memory that in the early days of
Puffin crossing these were trailed but I haven't heard of their use
since.

Can anyone shed any light on current providers please ?

Regards

Graham Bristo
Senior Traffic Signal Engineer
HA area 8

///carillion-URS

One team leading the way in quality, innovative and best value provision
of highway services

T 01234 349641 (switchboard)
T 01234 373641 (direct)
F 01234 216268

Working on behalf of the Highways Agency to deliver Safe Roads, Reliable
Journeys and Informed Travellers.
e-mail address: graham.bristo@xxxxxxxxxxx

This email transmission is confidential and intended for the addressee
only. It may contain privileged and confidential information. If you are
not the person or organisation to whom it is addressed, you must not
copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance upon it. If you have
received this in error, please notify the Postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
and return it.

Carillion-URS is a joint venture company of:

Carillion Highway Maintenance Limited. Registered in England No. 3198709
Registered Office, Birch Street, Wolverhampton WV1 4HY and URS
Corporation Limited. Registered in Scotland No. 118271 Registered
Office, 243 West George Street, Glasgow G2 4QE
-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about the list
visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from South Gloucestershire
Council are confidential and intended=3D20 solely for the use of the
individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received
this email in error=3D20 please notify the South Gloucestershire
Council=3D20 Postmaster at the address below.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has=3D20 been swept
for the presence of computer viruses.

postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
**********************************************************************
-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about the list
visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug


-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
-- Type: image/gif
-- File: graycol.gif


-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
-- Type: image/gif
-- File: pic25547.gif


-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
-- Type: image/gif
-- File: ecblank.gif


-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about the list
visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from South
Gloucestershire Council are confidential and intended=20
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error=20
please notify the South Gloucestershire Council=20
Postmaster at the address below.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has=20
been swept for the presence of computer viruses.

postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
**********************************************************************
-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about
the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug

Other related posts: