[TCUG] Re: Detection Problems at Pedestrian Crossings
- From: "Tony Sharp" <Tony.Sharp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:44:40 +0100
Peter and Chris are on to something here
Having recently had a sietag unit apart (hair brained idea about how we
could detect horses!!)there doesn't seem to be a lot to=20
them! (it's mostly mounting to attach to a bus) it shouldn't take much
work to cut a loop that (along with a push button demand) switches in an
alternative stage giving a longer fixed time to cross???
Anthony Sharp=20
Engineer (Traffic Signals)=20
Highways
South Gloucestershire Council=20
Broad lane, Yate BS37 7FY=20
Tel: (01454) 86 3605=20
Fax: (01454) 86 3757=20
Find out more about the work of the Highways Section at:
www.southglos.gov.uk/highways
=20
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: tcug-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tcug-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Bull Peter
Sent: 17 July 2007 15:11
To: 'tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [TCUG] Re: Detection Problems at Pedestrian Crossings
This looks like a specific difficult location which warrants some
special engineering attention, and if necessary an application to DfT
for special authorisation. Would it be possible to use something like an
RNIB React keyfob to introduce some longer timings, together with
modified on-crossing detectors and additional push-buttons? Oh and also
consider reducing the speed limit as well. In other words, I agree with
everybody else's suggestions.
Peter Bull
-----Original Message-----
From: Traffic Signals [mailto:traffic.signals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 17 July 2007 15:00
To: tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [TCUG] Re: Detection Problems at Pedestrian Crossings
Is all this not a failing on our own parts as well as the signals
companies?
We have keyfobs for our cars. We have Livewire for AGD. We have
Bluetooth on our phones, laptops, even our controllers.
Why are we not adopting technology so that these people do not have
problems at our crossings, such as having special pushbuttons even lower
down than normal, or getting stuck on our crossings in the middle of the
road.
The technology is out there - is it not up to us to be engaging the
disabled populace and the signals companies together to actually make
these crossings work for us all?
We've had Puffin technology for what, ten years? And clearly we've still
not got it right. What with all these stories of puffins being ripped
out in favour of pelicans and all the negative press that some areas of
the country seem to generate regarding nearsides...
Why do we often seem to wait for the DfT to do anything about anything?
If we keep up with that, we'll die of old age before any good comes. Is
it not our collective *responsibility* (given all the things we talk
about on this forum) to all get together and actually bottom this out
once and for all for the benefit of ALL?
Chris Pearson
Traffic Systems Engineer
Milton Keynes Council
visit the Milton Keynes Council web site at =3D
http://www.milton-keynes.gov.uk
Please consider the environment and don't print this e-mail unless you =3D=
really need to.
**** This e-mail and any attachments hereto are strictly confidential =3D=
and intended solely for the addressee. It may contain information which
=3D is privileged. If you are not the intended addressee, you must not =3D=
disclose, forward, copy or take any action in reliance of this e-mail or
=3D attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please delet=
e
=3D it and notify us as soon as possible.
The anti-virus software used by Milton Keynes Council is updated =3D
regularly in an effort to minimise the possibility of viruses infecting
=3D our systems.
However, you should be aware that there is no absolute =3D guarantee that=
any files attached to this e-mail are virus free.****
-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about the list
visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ The information in this email is intended for the addressee(s) only.
If you are not the addressee, please
tell us by using the reply facility
in your email software as soon as
possible.=20
Sheffield City Council cannot accept
any responsibility for the accuracy
or completeness of this message as it
has been transmitted over a public
network. If you suspect that the
message may have been intercepted or
amended please tell us as soon as
possible.
Sheffield City Council may monitor all email passing through its
networks.
-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about the list
visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from South
Gloucestershire Council are confidential and intended=20
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error=20
please notify the South Gloucestershire Council=20
Postmaster at the address below.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has=20
been swept for the presence of computer viruses.
postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
**********************************************************************
-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about
the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug
Other related posts:
