[studiorecorder] Re: New Beta Available
- From: "Jayson Smith" <ratguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 10:08:32 -0500
Hi,
Goldwave must be able to interface with the Windows mixer. SR could
probably be made to do that were it not for the fact that, as Rob pointed
out, some professional sound cards can't use the Windows mixer, instead
using their own custom mixer applications, so such functionality would not
work on these cards.
Jayson.
----- Original Message -----
From: "JStiers" <JStiers@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 9:36 AM
Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: New Beta Available
> David
> Thanks for the information, I didn't know that the line-in had a seperate
> record function.
> I say that because I have been using goldwave to convert casetts to files
> and have had no trouble using the line-in for recording.Goldwave must have
> its own configuration for recording.
> Thanks again.
> John Stiers
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Tanner" <David.Tanner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 4:35 AM
> Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: New Beta Available
>
>
> > John,
> >
> > I guess I am not sure what you are wanting? I run my mikes,
> > turntable, tape deck, mini disc, and another computer's audio thru a
> > mixer and then to the input jack on my main system where I do all
> > the recording. Studio Recorder handles that just fine. Are you
> > sure you are setting the record input in the computer's soundcard
> > mixer with line-in as the item that is checked to receive input for
> > recording? As I am sure you probably know you can get to that
> > control either from the entertainment / volume settings in
> > accessories or from the control panel under sounds and audio. Just
> > remember that you have to set 1 input as your recording input. Just
> > checking line-in under playback doesn't mean that what you are
> > hearing is what is going to get recorded.
> >
> >
> >
> > David Tanner
> > Rehabilitation Program Specialist 3
> > Assistive Technology Specialist - Blind
> > Assistive Technology Department
> > MN State Services f/t Blind
> > Office- 651-642-0795 Cell- 651-270-2233
> >
> >
> >>>> JStiers@xxxxxxxxxxx 02/01 6:19 AM >>>
> > Rob
> >
> > When I mentioned the use of mixers, sorry, but I was refering to
> > external
> > mixers.
> > I work for a radio reading service, and was thinking along the
> > lines of
> > broadcast equipment and the like.
> >
> > I found that if I plug my external mixer in to the mic input, I had
> > to
> > adjust all my pots down to compensate for the mic input. If SR had
> > a line
> > input it woodn't be necessarry to do that.
> > John
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "ROB MEREDITH" <rmeredith@xxxxxxx>
> > To: <studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 5:28 AM
> > Subject: [studiorecorder] Re: New Beta Available
> >
> >
> >> John:
> >>
> >> While this isn't a bad idea, most professional sound cards don't
> > offer
> >> a mixer that software like Studio Recorder can access. So, this
> > feature
> >> would have limited usefulness
> >>
> >> Rob Meredith.
> >>
> >>>>> JStiers@xxxxxxxxxxx 01/28/06 08:47PM >>>
> >> Rob
> >> I think it would be a good idea to add a line-in choice to the
> > menus of
> >>
> >> Studio Recorder.
> >> I say this because a lot ov people are using mixers going in to
> > the
> >> line-in
> >> accessory on their soundcard.
> >> Thank you
> >> John Stiers
> >> ther
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "ROB MEREDITH" <rmeredith@xxxxxxx>
> >> To: <studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 12:26 PM
> >> Subject: [studiorecorder] New Beta Available
> >>
> >>
> >>> There is a new beta version of Studio Recorder available. Thanks
> > to
> >>> Sarah and others, it has some timely changes and aditions which
> >> should
> >>> make life while using it a lot better. Never again will you have
> > to
> >> deal
> >>> with selection points getting flipped!
> >>>
> >>> Rob Meredith
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Other related posts:
