[studiorecorder] Re: New Beta Available

  • From: Curtis Delzer <curtis@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 23:33:22 -0700

I truly believe those who beta test, suggest ideas which are implemented, find bugs which are fixed should get a discount on the program. After all, the facts are that Rob wouldn't find out problems or potential areas of improvement without the beta testers, in house or in the public betas, so if we signed up, agreed to beta test and subject ourselves to the potential problems of such and such a beta, we should be given a discount.
We did agree not to tell anyone about what we are doing, and though it is true that practically anyone who truly wished of had the inclination could do it, not many people would take the time. We take the time, the beta testers and those on this list to suggest and check out features and functions to see if they are practical, work properly, and don't crash the program. It is a better piece of software truly because of Rob, and those of us who ran the beta to see if x y and z work while c d and e are also working.



Curtis Delzer




At 09:15 PM 8/11/2006, you wrote:
I ordinarily don't do this, but I just have to agree with you, and
that's about all I have to say.  Some how it seems to me that beta
testers should be Studio Recorder owners or a family member or
employee of someone who owns a licensed copy of SR.

I'm not trying to slam anybody, but its' only fair that those
involved with the beta testing should be licensed users.   I do
realize that the product costs $200, but that really isn't a
unreasonable price, and if a person isn't willing to pay the $200
then I'm not sure that they should be on the beta team for that
product.




David Tanner Rehabilitation Program Specialist 3 Assistive Technology Specialist Assistive Technology Department MN State Services f/t Blind Office- 651-642-0795 Cell- 651-270-2233 Skype name: dtat100


>>> neal.ewers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 8/11/2006 6:39 PM >>> Michael. I think that means you need to purchase the real copy. APH has been very good at letting people simply be beta testers without purchasing the full release, but I am not sure if they want this to be the practice of people who use the product. Of course, this is not an official comment, just one that suggests that we should all support the products that people have worked so hard to provide for us.

Neal





-----Original Message-----
From: studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:studiorecorder-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael
Killian
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 6:35 PM
To: studiorecorder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [studiorecorder] New Beta Available


When I got the beta file, I was told that the authorization expired on August 1,2006. Is the new beta up there yet?

Michael Killian K4MFK
Nashville, Tn
k4mfk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



--
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.8.3/360 - Release Date:
6/9/2006








Other related posts: