[rollei_list] Re: Digital printing v. Analog
- From: "Austin Franklin" <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 11:43:07 -0400
Hi Peter,
> I am referring to an SLR of even 4 MP.
Even a 4mp DSLR won't give you "equal" quality to decent 35mm and most
certainly not a decent MF film camera. There just isn't enough information
there. Do the arithmetic.
> If the camera was specifically
> a P&S, that would change things a bit. But the original comment did
> not specify a P&S, just a digital image.
The original comment, from Marc, was specifically about P&S digicams, and I
quote:
"On the other hand, I have a couple of inexpensive P&S digital cameras.
They can take 256 or so exposures on a single card, each of which will then
be able to be printed to at least 20" by 24" without any noticeable problem
with quality."
Regards,
Austin
> On 4/15/05, Austin Franklin <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >=20
> > > I have seen many digital images. Done right, you could not tell the
> > > difference between a quality digital image at 11x14 or one from a film
> > > camera.
> >=20
> > Absolutely, but not from a 4.1mp digital P&S.
> >=20
> > Regards,
> >=20
> > Austin
> >=20
> >=20
>
>
> --=20
> Peter K
> =D3=BF=D5=AC
>
>
Other related posts:
