[rollei_list] Re: Digital printing v. Analog

  • From: Richard Urmonas <rurmonas@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 20:58:20 +0930

On 16/04/2005, at 6:18 AM, Peter K. wrote:

> I think a lot depends on how they are done. If I showed you several
> images both digital and analog, blown up to 11 x 14 I would doubt you
> could tell the difference.
> Of course, I am referring to a decent SLR and not a P&S.=20
>
> Peter K
>

If both sets of shots are well done (i.e. not limited by camera shake 
or similar),
and they are typical shots (it is often possible to choose shots which 
'mask' the deficiencies of a camera) they yes, I would tell the 
difference.  I just need to look
for the lack of detail.

Richard
---
Richard Urmonas


Other related posts: