[rollei_list] AW: Re: Comparison: scanned Rolleiflex Slide vs. 100 ISO ditigal...
- From: <Dirk-Roger.Schmitt@xxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:23:11 +0000
Bu you should compare the price of a new Rolleiflex with and without digital
back.
Dirk
________________________________
Von: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Im Auftrag von David Sadowski
Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. Februar 2012 23:20
An: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [rollei_list] Re: Comparison: scanned Rolleiflex Slide vs. 100 ISO
ditigal...
How can you say that film is cheaper? Once you buy the camera, digital is
surely cheaper. And, when you compare the cost of a new Rolleiflex to a new
digital SLR, no advantage to film either.
Over the life of the camera, the total outlay for digital is surely less than a
comparable quality camera purchased new using film.
Other related posts:
