>Mhm. It's not that bad as one might think. It's very clean. But it's too >ahistoric. It's impossible to forget 30 years of FORTH programming history or >so :) > > Why not? I try to keep historical useage of words in mind, but I'm willing to break compatibility with various standards and historical implementations if I can do something better :-) In this case though, renaming create to create: would be a major change that isn't something I'd want to try explaining to newcomers. So it's out. (Besides, I think that 'create' is a good name for what it does.) -- Charles