Harry What is the technical explanation you were given? Regards Ralph W. Lambrecht http://www.darkroomagic.comThis electronic message contains information that is confidential, legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. This information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, printing or any other use of, or any action in reliance on, the contents of this electronic message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and destroy the original message immediately.
P don't print this e-mail unless you really have to On Feb 28, 2010, at 18:05, harry kalish wrote:
There is a technical explanation for the reason why greater enlargements loose contrast. For greater enlargements, I have found that better printscan be produced from contrastier negs (or a highter contrast filter if printing on MG paper). Harry On 2/27/10 5:10 PM, "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:----- Original Message ----- From: "Shannon Stoney" <shannonstoney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2010 11:51 AM Subject: [pure-silver] contrast changesI've been making "work prints" for the first time: that is, enlarging to a print on 8x10 paper and getting contrast right before bumping up to the more expensive 11x14. Usually this works pretty well. But in my last printing session, it didn't: the big print looked a lot "flatter" than the little print, which looked fine, at the same paper grade. I guess I could have agitated less, but I made two big prints and made a point of agitating the second one so that this wouldn't be a problem. Could larger paper be subtly different in contrast? Or could a bigger print just "look" flatter? --shannonShannon, I think this is an optical illusion, its fairly well known. One way of proving it is to overlay the small print on the large one and see if there is a visible difference in the shadow densities. The eye is pretty good at matching brightness of adjacent areas so one can make such comparisons visually with good precision. There may be other effects such as a reciprocity failure in the paper but the comparison should helf find if that is happening. -- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx= = = = = = = = = ====================================================================================================To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)and unsubscribe from there.= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ====================================================================== To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.